I have long tried to convince people that the United States is well on its way to being a full-fledged police state. I’ve even written on “How Police States Are Born.” Despite the signs, people who I usually think of as intelligent still think I’m being — at best — eccentric. At worst, they just write me off as a nut job.
The truth is, the United States actually already is a police state. We just haven’t all been put on lockdown yet.
But we’re getting there. This past week, we’ve taken a major step forward, and the process has kicked into a higher gear. (Edit 3/21/2017: YouTube video has vanished; link removed.)
If you ask me, the hunt for Chris Dorner has laid bare the fact that we are no longer “on the way” to being a police state: we’ve arrived. It’s just that nothing significant has been cause for a roll-out until now. Now, with Dorner, the police show their true colors. As another attorney noted on my Facebook page, they aren’t even pretending anymore:
“The chief said there had been a ‘night of extreme tragedy in the Los Angeles area’ and that the department was taking measures to ensure the safety of officers.” My favorite quote…….What about ensuring others’ safety from innocent-victim-shooting officers? Three innocent people shot at in two separate incidents? I guess we are all just necessary collateral damage in their quest to protect the Brotherhood….How many innocents will be shot in their not so professional manhunt?1
Good question. They shoot indiscriminately at innocent people because they happen to be driving — and Dorner, they believe, was driving at some point — so you can see that there’s a similarity. In an excessive display of fairness, I’ll say that the cops believed those people were driving vehicles that matched the description of that driven by Dorner. However, if you follow the links and read the stories, you’ll see something like this:
His [the citizen in the second shooting based on “mistaken identity”] pickup, police later explained, matched the description of the one belonging to Christopher Jordan Dorner — the ex-cop who has evaded authorities after allegedly killing three and wounding two more. But the pickups were different makes and colors. And Perdue looks nothing like Dorner: He’s several inches shorter and about a hundred pounds lighter. And Perdue is white; Dorner is black.
The two Hispanic women shot by seven police officers earlier were not black, either. And the vehicle they were driving was a different model and color than that Dorner drove.
This isn’t the first time the police have fired on citizens without good cause. But getting back to Dorner, police have surrounded the homes of ordinary citizens with snipers and conducted door-to-door searches without warrants. They’ve shut down freeways with Homeland Security doing vehicle-to-vehicle searches.
Oh, and now they’re talking about using drones to go after Dorner.
The police state of which we are getting a glimpse did not develop overnight. Nor did it necessarily — for those of my friends who think I’m just anti-cop — develop for nefarious reasons.
What’s happening is just part-and-parcel of the growing transformation of police agencies throughout the United States over at least the last couple of decades. You can’t transform public servants into warriors and then not expect them to go to war.
I’m glad to be home, to have put away my uniforms, to wake up next to my wife each morning. I worry about my friends who are in Iraq now, and I wish they weren’t. Often I hated being there, when the frustrations and lack of control over my life were complete and mind-bending. I questioned my role in the occupation and whether good could come of it. I wondered if it was worth dying or killing for. The suffering and ugliness I saw disgusted me. But war twists and shifts the landmarks by which we navigate our lives, casting light on darkened areas that for many people remain forever unexplored. And once those darkened spaces are lit, they become part of us. At a party several years ago, long before the Army, I listened to a friend who had served several years in the Marines tell a woman that if she carried a pistol for a day, just tucked in her waistband and out of sight, she would feel different. She would see the world differently, for better or worse. Guns empower. She disagreed and he shrugged. No use arguing the point; he was just offering a little piece of truth. He was right, of course. And that’s just the beginning.
Over the last two or so decades, we’ve given more power than ever before to local police forces. We’ve armed them with assault weapons.
(That last link, by the way, takes you to a story from TechDirt, of all places, discussing a police chief who allegedly stated that in 2013, he will be sending SWAT teams armed with officers into so-called “high crime areas” to stop and request identification from anyone they encounter. I wonder how much longer my friends will tell me I’m crazy for calling the United States a “police state.”)
We’ve given them armored personnel carriers. That last linked story is about “tanks,” but shows a picture of what is actually an armored personnel carrier. (Here are more.) But some police departments do have actual tanks.
And they post snipers at football games, ready to take out anyone in the crowd “as necessary.”
Despite how often it appears so, this is no joke.
But Mockenhaupt is right. This sort of thing changes the police.
You don’t have to “blame the police” to recognize this. Talking about it — doing something about it — does not have to mean that you are “anti-cop,” as I am so often accused of being. Because I’m not actually anti-cop. I’m anti-dishonest cop. I’m anti-cop-as-overlord cop. I’m anti-you-will-lie-prostrate-before-me cop.
The problem is, folks, Andy Griffith has left the building.
“If we’re training cops as soldiers, giving them equipment like soldiers, dressing them up as soldiers, when are they going to pick up the mentality of soldiers? If you look at the police department, their creed is to protect and to serve. A soldier’s mission is to engage his enemy in close combat and kill him. Do we want police officers to have that mentality? Of course not.” — Arthur Rizer, former civilian police officer and member of the military
Yeah, that’s right. That was a cop who said that. And he’s not the only one.
Are we a police state? Of course we are. You just didn’t — maybe still don’t, if you won’t pull your head out of…the sand — know it. Even PBS talks about it. (NPR is content to document steps in that direction without naming it what it is.)
What is it going to take to turn this back around? I’m not sure it can be turned back around. But, for starters, people have to wake up. They need to start talking. To each other. To their state representatives. To their federal representatives. Complain. And complain loudly. If you see cops mishandling citizens, or are mishandled yourself: file a complaint. You don’t have to do it on the spot. You don’t have to risk your own life. You can go to the police station where they will give you a form to fill out. Sure, they will ignore your form…for now. But if everyone who witnessed police misconduct would file a complaint, something would get done about it — believe me, there’s enough misconduct that the police department would be flooded with forms if people would just complain.
If you don’t want to complain about out-of-control militarized police-with-attitude-problems, then just help do something to stop the failed war on drugs — because that’s what started this mess. Prohibition. Just as the prohibition of alcohol lead to the birth of organized crime, so has the prohibition on marijuana and other drugs lead directly to the police state.
And it’s only going to get worse, unless you do something. Hell, if you can’t do anything else, at least click one of the buttons at the end of this post to spread it on Google+, Facebook, and to others who might do more.
Because at the moment — and with the ongoing calls of idiot liberals to disarm us all it’s only going to get worse — they have us outgunned.
And that, my friends, is what makes a police state.
- I’ve corrected some typographical elements, but otherwise, this is her quote. [↩]